Skip to main content
Log in

Restoring coastal habitat using marsh terracing: The effect of cell size on nekton use

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marsh terracing is used to restore coastal wetlands by converting shallow nonvegetated bottom to intertidal marsh. Terraces are constructed from excavated bottom sediments, and are commonly arranged in a checkerboard pattern of square cells with open corners to form terrace fields. In 1999, terrace cells of three sizes (large = 122 m sides with 1.30 ha ponds; medium = 61 m sides with 0.29 ha ponds; small = 30 m sides with 0.06 ha ponds) were incorporated into a restoration project constructed at Galveston Island State Park, Texas, USA. This restoration project provided an opportunity to examine how nekton populations and the cost effectiveness of terracing projects vary with cell size. We compared nekton density and biomass (as measures of habitat value) in marsh and open water habitat types among the three cell sizes of the terrace fields. We also compared the habitat value of these terrace fields with the area before project construction, with nearby nonvegetated bottom, and with natural marsh habitat. Nekton abundance and biomass increased substantially in the project area following restoration by marsh terracing. An analysis of post-construction samples detected few statistically significant differences in animal density and biomass among cell sizes or between the terraced areas and adjacent natural habitats. Within terrace cells, density, biomass, and species richness were generally higher in marsh vegetation than over nonvegetated bottom. Using these post-construction density data, GIS, and population models for selected fishery species, we show that populations of most fishery species increase as cell size decreases. However, as cell size decreases, the cost of terrace construction increases much faster than population size. Therefore, terrace fields constructed of medium or large cells would be more cost effective in providing fishery habitat than would terraces composed of small cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Abele, L. and W. Kim. 1986. An Illustrated Guide to the Marine Decapod Crustaceans of Florida, Part 1. State of Florida, Department of Environmental Regulation, Technical Series.

  • Akin, S., K. O. Winemiller, and F. P. Gelwick. 2003. Seasonal and spatial variations in fish and macrocrustacean assemblage structure in Mad Island Marsh estuary, Texas. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57: 269–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltz, D. M., C. Rakocinski, and J. W. Fleeger. 1993. Microhabitat use by marsh-edge fishes in a Louisiana estuary. Environmental Biology of Fishes 36: 109–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush Thom, C. S., M. K. G. La Peyre, and J. A. Nyman. 2004. Evaluation of nekton use and habitat characteristics of restored Louisiana marsh. Ecological Engineering 23: 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos, D. L. and L. P. Rozas. 2001. Nekton use of submerged aquatic vegetation, marsh, and shallow unvegetated bottom in the Atchafalaya River Delta, a Louisiana tidal freshwater ecosystem. Estuaries 24: 184–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittel, A. I., A. H. Hines, G. M. Ruiz, and K. K. Ruffin. 1995. Effects of shallow water refuge on behavior and density-dependent mortality of juvenile blue crabs in Chesapeake Bay. Bulletin of Marine Science 57: 902–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gossman, B. P. 2005. Use of terraced marsh habitats by estuarine nekton in southwestern Louisiana. M.S. Thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heard, R. W. 1982. Guide to common tidal marsh invertebrates of the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, Ocean Springs, MS, USA. MASGP-79-004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoese, H. D. and R. H. Moore. 1998. Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico, Texas, Louisiana, and Adjacent Waters, second edition. Texas A & M University Press, College Station, TX, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Peyre, M., B. Gossman, and J. Nyman. 2007. Assessing functional equivalency of nekton habitat in enhanced habitats: comparison of terraced and unterraced marsh ponds. Estuaries and Coasts 30: 526–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, R. J. 1997. Trophic response of estuarine fishes to long-term changes in river runoff. Bulletin of Marine Science 60: 984–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEachran, J. D. and J. D. Fechhelm. 1998. Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico, Volume 1: Myxiniformes to Gasterosteiformes. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIvor, C. C. and W. E. Odum. 1988. Food, predation risk, and microhabitat selection in a marsh fish assemblage. Ecology 69: 1341–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minello, T. J. 1999. Nekton densities in shallow estuarine habitats of Texas and Louisiana and the identification of essential fish habitat. In L. Benaka (ed.) Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Habitat Rehabilitation. American Fisheries Society Symposium 22:43-75.

  • Minello, T. J. 2000. Temporal development of salt marsh value for nekton and epifauna: utilization of dredged material marshes in Galveston Bay, Texas. Wetlands Ecology and Management 8: 327–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minello, T. J. and L. P. Rozas. 2002. Nekton in Gulf Coast wetlands: fine-scale distributions, landscape patterns, and restoration implications. Ecological Applications 12: 441–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minello, T. J. and J. W. Webb, Jr. 1997. Use of natural and created Spartina alterniflora salt marshes by fishery species and other aquatic fauna in Galveston Bay, Texas, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 151: 165–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minello, T. J. and R. J. Zimmerman. 1992. Utilization of natural and transplanted Texas salt marshes by fish and decapod crustaceans. Marine Ecology Progress Series 90: 273–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando, S. P., Jr., L. P. Rozas, G. H. Ward, and C. J. Klein. 1991. Analysis of salinity structure and stability for Texas estuaries. NOAA National Ocean Service, Strategic Assessments Branch, Rockville, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, A. W. and A. K. Whitfield. 2000. Do shallow-water habitats function as refugia for juvenile fishes? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 51: 359–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Farfante, I. and B. Kensley. 1997. Penaeoid and sergestoid shrimps and prawns of the world: keys and diagnoses for the families and genera. Mémoires du Muséum National d’Historie Naturelle, Volume 175, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G. W. and R. E. Turner. 1994. The value of salt marsh edge versus interior as a habitat for fish and decapod crustaceans in a Louisiana tidal marsh. Estuaries 17: 235–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakocinski, C. F., D. M. Baltz, and J. W. Fleeger. 1992. Correspondence between environmental gradients and the community structure of marsh-edge fishes in a Louisiana estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 80: 135–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, W. J. (ed.). 2005. Early Stages of Atlantic Fishes: An Identification Guide for the Western Central North Atlantic, Volumes 1 & 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L. P., P. Caldwell, and T. J. Minello. 2005a. The fishery value of salt marsh restoration projects. Journal of Coastal Research SI 40: 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L. P. and T. J. Minello. 2006. Nekton use of salt marsh, seagrass, and nonvegetated habitats in a South Texas (USA) estuary. Bulletin of Marine Science 63: 481–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L. P. and T. J. Minello. 2001. Marsh terracing as a wetland restoration tool for creating fishery habitat. Wetlands 21: 327–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L. P. and T. J. Minello. 2006. Nekton use of Vallisneria americana Michx. (wild celery) beds and adjacent habitats in coastal Louisiana. Estuaries and Coasts 29: 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L. P., T. J. Minello, I. Munyera-Fernandez, B. Fry, and B. Wissel. 2005b. Macrofaunal distributions and habitat change following winter-spring releases of freshwater into the Breton Sound Estuary, Louisiana (USA). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 65: 319–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L. P., T. J. Minello, R. J. Zimmerman, and P. Caldwell. In Press. Nekton populations, long-term wetland loss, and the effect of recent habitat restoration in Galveston Bay, TX (USA). Marine Ecology Progress Series.

  • Rozas, L. P. and D. J. Reed. 1994. Comparing nekton assemblages of subtidal habitats in pipeline canals traversing brackish and saline marshes in coastal Louisiana. Wetlands 14: 262–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, G. M., A. H. Hines, and M. H. Posey. 1993. Shallow water as a refuge habitat for fish and crustaceans in non-vegetated estuaries: an example from Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 99: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, G. D. 1993. Sabine terracing project final report. Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Coastal Resources Division, Baton Rouge, LA, USA. DNR Project Number 4351089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. L., R. J. Zimmerman, and T. J. Minello. 1990. Abundance patterns of juvenile blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) in nursery habitats of two Texas bays. Bulletin of Marine Science 46: 115–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. E. and Streever, B.. 2002. Approaches to Coastal Wetland Restoration: Northern Gulf of Mexico. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, S. G., G. D. Steyer, B. Good, and D. Chambers. 1991. Bay bottom terracing and vegetative planting: an innovative approach for habitat and water quality enhancement. p. 164–73. In F. J. Webb, Jr (ed.) Annual Conference on Wetlands Restoration and Creation. Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W. A., T. A. Tremblay, R. L. Waldinger, and T. R. Calnan. 2004. Status and trends of wetland and aquatic habitats on barrier islands, upper Texas Coast, Galveston and Christmas Bays. Final Report to the Texas General Land Office and NOAA. Texas Bureau of Economic Geology. Austin, TX, USA (available online at http:// www.glo.state.tx.us/coastal/statustrends/galveston-christmas/ index.html).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W. A., T. A. Tremblay, E. G. Wermund, Jr., and L. R. Handley. 1993. Trends and status of wetland and aquatic habitats in the Galveston Bay system, Texas. Galveston Bay National Estuary Program, Webster, Texas, USA. GBNEP-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. B. 1984. Shrimps, Lobsters, and Crabs of the Atlantic Coast of the Eastern United States, Maine to Florida. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, R. J., T. J. Minello, and G. Zamora. 1984. Selection of vegetated habitat by brown shrimp, Penaeus aztecus, in a Galveston Bay salt marsh. Fishery Bulletin, US 82: 325–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence P. Rozas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rozas, L.P., Minello, T.J. Restoring coastal habitat using marsh terracing: The effect of cell size on nekton use. Wetlands 27, 595–609 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[595:RCHUMT]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[595:RCHUMT]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation